After reading Benjamin's "The work of Art, in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction", I think Benjamin's attitude toward reproduction, aura, mass and modern arts is very interesting. I try to conclude the points I got as following:
First of all, the mechanical reproduction took away the aura of traditional arts. “that which withers in the age of mechanical reproduction is the aura of the work of art. (P221)” In Benjamin’s opinion, the authenticity and awe are the two essential contents of “aura”, and he felt pity that the aura of of the work of art was reduced by mechanical reproduction.
Secondly, Benjamin is a Marxist. In his mind, “people” is more important than “aura.” It means, although he thought aura of arts was important, everyone’s accessibility to arts is more meaningful. Art is no longer high culture which only belongs to rich people. Mechanical reproduction brings democracy to art, and allows mass to access art and even participate in the art production. For example, everyone can listen to music via video, TV, walkman, ipod or internet. Benjamin said in his book, “today there is hardly a gainfully employed European who could not, in principle, find an opportunity to publish somewhere or other comments on his work, grievances, documentary reports, or that sort of thing. (P232)”
Thirdly, “shock” is instead of “aura.” For example, movie as a kind of art is constituted with more realistic contents, which makes the viewers feel astonished and shocked. This kind of art can help people better understand the reality of today’s society.